How AI & LLM tracking & monitoring tools work? Track your brand in AI Search results [Tools, Metrics, & Reality Checks]

AI search is changing how people find information online. By mid-2025, AI-powered search engines handle over 2 billion queries daily. People now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Chat for recommendations instead of just searching Google.

This creates a problem for businesses. Your website might rank well on Google, but your brand could be invisible in AI answers. Traditional SEO doesn't guarantee AI visibility.

Birth of a new industry

Companies like Profound, AthenaHQ, and Peec AI have built tools to track brand mentions in AI responses. This field is called Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) or Generative Engine Optimization (GEO).

The funding activity shows demand: Profound raised $20 million in Series A, AthenaHQ is backed by Y Combinator with ex-Google/DeepMind engineers, and Peec AI received seed funding from Antler.

‍

What these tools do:

• Monitor brand mentions across major AI search engines
• Track sentiment of mentions
• Show which sources AI models reference
• Reveal user questions through conversation analysis
• Monitor how AI crawlers index content

Enterprise tools like Profound provide real-time tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google SGE, and Bing Copilot. They include sentiment analysis, citation tracking, and agent analytics.

Mid-market tools like Peec AI offer self-service dashboards with trend analysis, competitive benchmarking, and prompt-level tracking to identify which queries mention your brand.

How AI search tracking tools actually work

After testing multiple AI monitoring platforms, we found they rely on synthetic data, not real user interactions. Here's the process:

1. Tools run automated prompts through AI APIs at regular intervals
2. They ask questions like "What's the best project management tool?", covering your target keywords
3. AI models return answers, which the tool analyzes for brand mentions
4. Results get compiled into dashboards showing your "AI visibilit.y"

As Andreessen Horowitz notes, these platforms "work by running synthetic queries at scale" and organize outputs into dashboards for marketing teams.

Some tools customize prompts to match different buyer personas (CFO vs. developer questions) and include SEO keywords to test content pickup.

Synthetic data problems

This approach has significant limitations:

Coverage Gaps

Tools track a fixed set of prompts—maybe dozens or hundreds. Real users ask countless variations. Your tool might check "best B2B payment processor" but miss "cheapest international payment tool for startups" or "How do I automatically send invoices from Stripe to QuickBooks?"

These long-tail, high-intent queries often convert better, but synthetic tools miss them entirely. You get incomplete visibility into your actual AI presence.

Non-Deterministic Answers

AI models give different answers to the same question. Unlike Google results that stay relatively consistent, ChatGPT might recommend your software today but give different recommendations tomorrow.

AI responses vary based on:

• Slight changes in phrasing
• Previous conversation context
• User location or session
• Random model sampling

Users also engage in conversations, providing context that influences answers. A one-shot API query can't replicate this.

False Positives and Misleading Metrics

We observed cases where tools reported brands "ranked #1" for queries, but manual testing showed completely different AI responses. Conversely, brands showed zero mentions in limited prompt sets while appearing frequently in other questions.

One client's "AI visibility score" spiked because a prompt accidentally triggered a known fact about their brand, creating false dominance that real users wouldn't see.

Bottom line: Treat synthetic metrics as directional signals for macro trends, not precise KPIs. Use them for high-level monitoring, not granular decisions.

3 LLM SEO metrics we found valuable

Instead of chasing synthetic "AI visibility scores," focus on measurable metrics tied to real users and business impact:

1. AI Indexability Vector (Index Coverage)

This measures how much of your content AI systems can actually find and use. While AI models don't have public indexes like Google, they rely on data sources including:

• Web snapshots (for models with knowledge cutoffs)
• Real-time crawlers
• Search engine integration

How to track it:

• Use Atomic AGI or Cloudflare's AI Crawler Analytics to see which users and AI bots visit your pages
• Check if important pages (product pages, knowledge base) show AI bot traffic
• Ensure content is indexed by Bing and Google (prerequisite for many AI answers)
• Test by asking AI models directly: "What do you know about [My Company]?"

Improve your indexability:

• Add proper HTML text content for AI crawlers
• Check robots.txt doesn't block important pages
• Submit sitemaps (Bing supports IndexNow for faster indexing)
• Get high-authority sites to link to your content

2. Behavioural analytics from LLM sessions

Track what users do after clicking links in AI-generated answers. This shows real business impact from AI visibility.

What you can measure:

• Traffic volume from AI sources (ChatGPT shows as chat.openai.com referrer)
• Page engagement and conversion rates
• Which pages AI users land on most

Recent data shows 63% of websites have received at least one AI chatbot visitor. While AI traffic averages only 0.17% of monthly visits currently, it's growing fast and is higher in some industries.

Set up tracking:

• Connecte Google Analytics 4 to Atomic AGI for automated reports
• Compare AI visitor behavior to organic search visitors
• Analyze landing pages to reverse-engineer successful queries

Reverse-engineer from landing pages to most probable LLM questions: If your pricing page gets ChatGPT referrals, users likely asked "How much does [Your Product] cost?" You can then optimize content around pricing questions.

3. AI Crawler Activity

Monitor which AI bots crawl your content and how frequently. This predicts future AI visibility before it happens.

Tools to use:

• Cloudflare's AI Audit feature shows crawling by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Bard crawler, etc.
• Server logs can reveal bot activity patterns
• Track frequency and recency of crawls

What to look for:

• High crawler activity on certain content indicates potential use in AI answers
• Zero crawler visits suggest pages aren't on AI radar
• Increased crawl frequency over time shows growing AI interest in your site

Types of AI crawlers:

• Search crawlers (like OAI-SearchBot) find content for user queries with citations
• Data scrapers collect content for model training without attribution

Heavy crawler activity often precedes content appearing in AI answers by weeks or months.

Conclusion

AI search monitoring tools provide useful early insights, but don't rely on them for major strategic decisions. Their synthetic data has too many limitations.

Focus on objective metrics: ensure your content is accessible to AI systems, track actual traffic from AI referrals, and monitor crawler activity for early signals.

The fundamentals of good SEO still apply—create high-quality, relevant content. Structure it for AI consumption with clear answers, schema markup, and factual information that models can easily use.

With over a billion AI searches happening daily, brands that track their AI presence now will have advantages as this channel grows. Invest in understanding AI search like companies invested in Google SEO a decade ago.

Use monitoring tools to inform your strategy, but always verify with real data from your analytics and server logs. The goal is to ensure that when someone asks an AI about problems your product solves, your brand appears in the answer, and those conversations drive users to your site.

If you want your brand to stand out in AI search results and stay ahead with effective monitoring, let’s schedule a 30-minute consultation to help you optimize your AI visibility strategy.